# Learn from the experts: Create a successful blog with our brand new course

WordPress.com is excited to announce our newest offering: a course just for beginning bloggers where you’ll learn everything you need to know about blogging from the most trusted experts in the industry. We have helped millions of blogs get up and running, we know what works, and we want you to to know everything we know. This course provides all the fundamental skills and inspiration you need to get your blog started, an interactive community forum, and content updated annually.

# Fifth video about h-space theory

# Forth video about h-space theory

# Third video about h-space theory

Here is the third video in the series of videos about h-space theory.

# Second video about h-space theory

Here is the second video in the series of videos about h-space theory.

# First video about h-space theory

In a series of videos I am going to give a description of the key points of the theory. Here is the first video –

### A rigorous definition of new space in the h-space theory

I rewrote the definition of new space of the h-space theory in more rigorous way, see second post from 24.06.2018. Here is a quote of the definition and its comparison with Euclidean space.

**DEFINITION OF SPACE**

Volume contains two concepts: space of certain dimension and length. Length and energy are primary concepts. Neither energy, nor length can be reduced to a more elementary concept. For space we will use Hegel’s definition, which characterize space primarily as three dimensions. “Space has, as the concept in general (and more determinate than an indifferent self-externality) its differences within it: (a) in its indifference these are immediately the three dimensions, which are merely diverse and quite indeterminate ”(G .W. F. Hegel. “Philosophy of Nature”, § 198 ). According to Hegel’s ontology, space and time are interdependent. “This disappearance and regeneration of space in time and of time in space is motion; – a becoming, which, however, is itself just as much immediately the identically existing unity of both, or matter ” (G.W.F. Hegel. “Philosophy of Nature”, § 203). Since above, time was reduced to concept of motion that means not time, but motion exists in unity with the space. Before analysis of this unity in details, next we will look more thoroughly to existing definitions of space, or, more exactly, n-dimensional linear space in geometry. The n dimensional linear space is a direct descendant of Euclidean geometry, which is the geometry of real three-dimensional space used in physics.

“Definition 1. A linear space is n-dimensional if it contains a linearly independent system consisting of n vectors, and any system consisting of a large number of vectors is linearly dependent. The number n is called the dimension of linear space. Thus, the dimension of space – it is the largest number of linearly independent vectors. ”(N. V. Efimov and E. R. Rozendorn, “Linear algebra and multidimensional geometry”, 1969, page 35, Russian edition)

“Definition 2. The system of vectors **a**, **b**, **c**, … **q** is called linearly dependent if there is the equality

α**a** + β**b** + γ**c** + … + χ**q** = 0,

where from the numbers α, β, γ, … χ at least one is non-zero.

Definition 3. The system of vectors **a**, **b**, **c**, … **q** is linearly independent if the equation

α**a** + β**b** + γ**c** + … + χ**q** = 0,

is possible only if α = β = γ = … = χ = 0.”

(N. V. Efimov and E. R. Rozendorn, “Linear algebra and multidimensional geometry”, 1969, page 25, Russian edition)

“Zero space. Let L is the set consisting of only one element. What this element is we do not care. We denote it by the letter θ. We define for set L linear operations, assuming that θ in the sum with itself gives the θ and when θ is multiplied by any real number, we also obtain θ. It is easy to see that in this case, the requirements of the axioms I) – 8) are met. Thus, a set L is a real linear space consisting of a single, zero element. Clearly, with the same result set L can be defined as a complex space. Note. All other (real or complex) linear space must have an infinite number of elements. ”(N. V. Efimov and E. R. Rozendorn, “Linear algebra and multidimensional geometry”, 1969, page 16, Russian edition)

Since dimensions originated from the framework of three-dimensional Euclidean geometry, this forces us to consider other dimensions of space in a similar way. In this case, zero-dimensional space, as defined in the cited text, is not realistic, since the vector of zero length does not match anything, i.e. a physical object of zero length does not exist. This means that either any zero-dimensional space does not exist and is just a convenient mathematical construction, or the definition of zero-dimensional space requires revision. A revision is obvious if we look closely at the above quotation. There, the definition of zero-dimensional space does not follow from the general definition of the dimension of space. Zero-dimensional space introduced as a separate definition corresponding to the eight axioms of linear space. Let’s try to define the zero-dimensional space based on a common definition of the dimension where “the dimension of space – it is the largest number of linearly independent vectors”. Three-dimensional space requires three linearly independent vectors, two-dimensional – 2, one-dimensional – 1, then zero-dimensional – 0. Accordingly, zero-dimensional space is characterized by the absence of linearly independent vectors, and that also means that all vectors of zero-dimensional space are linearly dependent. Additionally, the vectors, as real objects of zero-dimensional space, should have non-zero length; the same as all other vectors in spaces of any dimensions.

**DEFINITION OF NEW SPACE IN LINEAR ALGEBRA**

**Definition 1**. The length (modulus) of a vector of n-dimensional space of any dimension is not zero.

Generally accepted definition of vector as a directed segment corresponds to the object of non-zero space, for example, the object of three-dimensional space. Such an object can be defined as a linearly independent vector.

**Definition 2**. Object of non-zero space is a linearly independent vector. A linearly independent vector is a vector of certain length in one direction.

**Definition 3**. The following 7 from 8 axioms of classical linear space are applied to linearly independent vectors of new space.

- Associativity of addition:
+ (**a**+**b**) = (**c**+**a**) +**b****c** - Commutativity of addition:
+**a**=**b**+**b****a** - Inverse elements of addition: for every
∈ V, there exists an element**a****–**∈ V, called the additive inverse of*a*, such that**a**+ (-**a**) = 0.**a** - Compatibility of scalar multiplication with field multiplication: α(β
**a***)*= (αβ)**a** - Identity element of scalar multiplication: 1
=**a**, where 1 denotes the multiplicative identity in F.**a** - Distributivity of scalar multiplication with respect to vector addition: α(
+**a**) = α**b**+ α**a****b** - Distributivity of scalar multiplication with respect to field addition: (α+ β)
= α**a**+ β**a****a**

where * a*,

*,*

**b****arbitrary vectors in**

*c***V**, and α and β

*scalars in F*

The mentioned above linear dependence of the vector of zero-dimensional space means that for a given vector, *a*_{0}, having non-zero modulus, |*a*_{0}|, the factor α* *must be different from zero, and the product of the vector, *a*_{0}, by a factor, α, should be zero.

*α**a*_{0}* *= 0

This is possible if the vector, *a*_{0}, has a non-zero modulus of length, |*a*_{0}|, and is oriented in such a way that in any given direction vector length is zero. In other words, the vector is located simultaneously in two opposite directions.

**Definition 4**. Object of zero-dimensional space ** a_{0 }**is a linearly dependent vector. Linearly dependent vector is a sum of two linearly independent vectors opposite to each other in any direction.

*α*** a_{0}** = α(–

*+*

**a***)*

**a**where, |*a*_{0}| = 2|** a**|

Visually, in three-dimensional space an object of zero-dimensional space, as a linearly dependent vector, corresponds not to a segment but to a ball, with a radius equal to the half of length of the vector, and it is directed away from or toward the center. In two-dimensional space – the circle of that radius, in one-dimensional space – the straight line of the length of the vector. In zero-dimensional space, an object of zero-dimensional space can be represented as a curve of arbitrary direction, whose length is the length of the object.

Following from the definitions above, an object of zero-dimensional space can also be defined as an undirected/ omnidirectional segment.

**Definition 5**. A linearly dependent vector is a non-directed/omnidirectional segment, collinear and opposite to any vector.

Thus, according to the presented concept of new space,zero-dimensional space is not a single vector/object of zero length, but a set of linearly dependent vectors/objects having non-zero lengths. Since the object of zero-dimensional space is defined as a sum of two linearly independent vectors opposite to each other in any direction for any dimension, zero-dimensional space can be defined as space of any dimension, i.e. it should be omnidimensional,

**Definition 6**. A zero-dimensional space is omnidimensional space and all n-dimensional spaces are subspaces of the zero-dimensional space.

From this definition, new concept of space implies that zero-dimensional space contains three-dimensional space. I.e. three-dimensional space is subspace of zero-dimensional space. For Euclidean geometry the situation is opposite, three-dimensional linear space includes zero-dimensional space. All features of this new space are presented in the next chapter, “METAPHYSICAL FOUNDATION OF h-SPACE THEORY”.

**DEFINITION OF NEW SPACE AS PHYSICAL SPACE**

Since the definition of a vector includes, besides the length (modulus), the notion of direction, the concept of a vector in physics is unthinkable without the concept of motion, defining the direction of motion. This allows to redefine the dimension of physical space as the maximum number (n) of independent motions, instead of linearly independent vectors.

**Definition 7**. The dimension of non-zero space in physics represents the maximum number (n) of independent motions.

This means, for example, that in a three-dimensional space, the motion of any object is a linear combination of its motion in the opposite directions of each of three independent motions, two-dimensional – a combination of two independent motions, and in the case of one-dimensional space – a combination of movements in opposite directions of one motion. In the case of zero-dimensional space, its objects are moving in all directions, i.e. visually it is similar to an expanding balloon.

In a formalized form, the n-dimension can be defined as n‑dimensional volume, i.e. *l *to the power of n – *l*^{n}.

In classical physics, space is independent from matter. In the general theory of relativity (GTR), space depends on matter, the curvature of space-time is generated by the energy and momentum of matter. In the proposed concept of space, the space-matter dependence is more fundamental, since there is nothing but space composed of objects. Space is discrete matter, where a material unit is an object of space, while time is a relative motion of the objects.

**COMPARISON OF EUCLIDEAN SPACE AND NEW SPACE OF h-SPACE THEORY**

### EXPERIMENTS TO TEST *h*‑SPACE THEORY

One more experiment.

**ABSORPTION OF PHOTONS BY ELECTRONS AND REFLECTION OF PHOTONS BY POSITRONS**

**Background. **In the proposed theory, electrons absorb photons. This causes an increase in the velocity of the electrons. Positrons reflect photons without changing the velocity of the positrons.

**Scheme of experiment 2.** The light reflected from the surface of the positively charged metal plate is expected to be more intensive and with less spectrum changes than the light reflected from negatively charged metal plate. The simplest set for the experiment can include:

- Laser pointer (red light),
- Aluminium plate,
- Сapacitor to charge the aluminium plate,
- Light intensity detector.

So, the luminosity of the laser light reflected by the charged aluminium plate can be measured by the light intensity detector.

.

### APPENDIX 2. EXPERIMENTS TO TEST *h*‑SPACE THEORY

**THE GRAVITATION EFFECT ON MAGNETIC FIELD AND MAGNETIC INTERACTION**

**Background.**In the proposed theory, the electric charge is determined by the density of undirected n=0-objects(I), *ρ _{0}*. And the increase of density

*ρ*(increase of gravity) corresponds to a decrease in

_{M }*ρ*, i.e. a decrease of the elementary charge. This means that magnetic field and, consequently, magnetic interaction depends on the gravitational potential.

_{0}**Scheme of experiment**. The repealing force at the same distance between two permanent magnets should be measured at Earth’s surface and at some distance from it. This force should be stronger at some distance from the surface than it is at the surface.

**THE CHARGE-TO-MASS RATIO OF A FREE PROTON**

**Background. **In the proposed theory, both charge and mass of the electron are 459 times larger than that in the textbooks. Because of the electron charge increase, the charge-to-mass ratio of a free proton is 9 times less than that of a free electron. From textbooks this value should be 1/1836. This value was first determined in electrolysis experiments and then in experiments conducted by Willi Wien and J.J. Thomson. According to the proposed theory, in Thomson’s experiments the charge-to-mass ratios of monovalent carbon and oxygen were mistakenly assigned to the charge-to-mass ratios of monovalent atomic hydrogen ion and molecular hydrogen ion.

**Scheme of experiment**. The Thomson’s experiment should be modified for a chemical detection of the spots corresponding to “hydrogen” ions. For this, the chromium metal plate as a detection screen can be used. If the proposed theory is correct then the spots will have different color corresponding to chromium oxide and chromium carbide. The chemical reaction of hydrogen with chromium should not give the colored spots.

**THE IONS CHARGES**

**Background. **In contrast to the textbooks, in the proposed theory the charges of monovalent ions of different chemical elements are different.

**Scheme of experiment**. Two bodies of symmetrical shape made of aluminium and lead can be charged while they are in a direct contact. This will generate their equal charges, but the different numbers of electrons/positrons should be present on these bodies. Their discharge to the ground will result in flows of different amounts of electrons, i.e. in the electric impulses of different amplitudes or in different stain intensities in the electrolysis experiment with the electrochromic electrolyte.

**VERIFICATION OF THE ELECTRON-POSITRON COMPOSITION OF PROTON AND NEUTRON**

**Background. **In the proposed theory, protons and neutrons are made up of electrons and positrons.

**Scheme of experiment 1**. The existing facilities can be used to conduct experiments on the collision of low-energy electrons and positrons. According to modern physics, these energies would be too low to form protons and antiprotons. However, the proposed theory predicts that protons and anti-protons, as well as other particles, would be formed as different complexes of the positrons and electrons.

**Scheme of experiment 2**. In the experiment the collision of high-energy electrons is conducted. According to modern physics, collision of high-energy electrons can result in the generation of particle-antiparticle pairs. In the proposed theory, the collision of high-energy electrons cannot result in production of any particles except of electrons.

**Scheme of experiment 3**. In the experiment positrons emitted by radionuclide (^{22}Na) are directed to a negatively charged metal target. According to the proposed theory, the interaction of positrons and electrons can result in the formation of protons and then hydrogen atoms. The detection system in this experiment should be designed to control the amount of hydrogen atoms.

**ABSORPTION OF PHOTONS BY ELECTRONS AND REFLECTION OF PHOTONS BY POSITRONS**

**Background. **In the proposed theory, electrons absorb photons. This causes an increase in the velocity of the electrons. Positrons reflect photons without changing the velocity of the positrons.

**Scheme of experiment. **The separate traps for electrons and positrons should be used. Then, electrons and positrons are irradiated with photons and changes in the velocities o electrons and positrons should be determined.

**VERIFICATION OF COULOMB’S LAW AT DISTANCES BELOW 10 ^{−}^{5 }METER**

**Background**. The proposed theory suggests that Coulomb’s law is not correct at the distance less than ≈ 10^{−}^{5} m. There is a direct proportionality of electrostatic attraction/repulsion to the square of distance, i.e. the velocity of attraction/repulsion between electrons/positrons does not increase (according to modern physics), but it decreases in the range from ≈ 10^{−}^{5} m to ≈ 10^{−}^{10} m. If the distance is in the range from ≈ 10^{−}^{10} m to ≈ 10^{−}^{15} m, the velocity of attraction/repulsion of electrons and positrons is zero.

**Scheme of experiment**. The following experiments can be conducted to validate electrostatic attraction/repulsion at distances less than ≈ 10^{−}^{5} m. An electron source is placed behind an electron filter with micrometer holes. The distances between pairs of holes range from millimeters to nanometers. Beyond the filter, a screen is placed which can register spots left by electrons that have passed the filter. The test allows a determination of electron spots with the distance between the holes in the filter. According to the suggested theory, reduction of the distance between adjacent holes down to 10^{−}^{5 }meters will cause increasing repulsion of the electron beams, and the electron spot on the detector screen will increase. But at distances less than 10^{−}^{5}meters, there will be less repulsion between electron beams, and the resulting spots will be smaller. The maximum spot size must be at a distance of 10^{−}^{5}meters. In contrast, according to modern physics, the repulsion of electron beams will increase with decreasing distance up to the collision of beams. Accordingly, the spots on the screen will also increase with decreasing distance between the holes in the filter.

Rather than pairs of electron beams, it would also be possible to use separate electron beams but with different diameters (diameters of holes in the filter). According to modern physics, with decreasing beam diameter, dispersion of the electron beam should increase due to mutual repulsion of electrons in the beam. Accordingly, the ratio of the spot diameter on the screen (for the same distance between the filter and the screen) to the initial diameter of the beam on the filter will increase. If the proposed theory is correct, then at beam diameters less than 10^{−}^{5}meters, the dispersion of electrons will decrease, as will the ratio of the spot diameter on the screen to diameter of the beam on the filter.

**THE CHANGE OF CHARGE NEAR NEUTRAL MOVING BODIES**

**Background**. According to the proposed theory, the motion of electrons and positrons changes the density of n=0-objects(I) *ρ _{0}*. As a result, a magnetic field is generated that consists of n=0‑objects(I) of density

*ρ*_{Δ}_{,}and directed according to the sign of the charge. In the case of the motion of a neutral body, there is also a change in the density

*ρ*, but n=0-objects(I) are not directed. The number n=0-objects(I), displaced by charged or neutral bodies depends on the speed and density of the bodies. Since the density

_{0}*ρ*determines the electron charge, then in the region near moving neutral bodies the value of density

_{0}*ρ*will by changed, i.e. the electrical charge will change.

_{0}**Scheme of experiment 1**.The electrostatic interaction of charges near the collision of masses could be measured, on the opposite sides of a shield stopping the moving body. For protection against electromagnetic radiation, a grounded screen should be placed between the shield and the device measuring charge interactions. In a similar way, the electrostatic interaction of charges can be measured near periodically moving masses, for example, near a rotating or linear moving neutral body.

**Scheme of experiment 2**.Electric current (pulses of electric current) is measured in a charged conductor when one end of the conductor is placed near a mass change, such as that generated by a rotating uncharged body. The other end is placed at some distance. Between the rotating body and the conductor, a screen is placed to protect against a possible electrons transfer induced by friction of the rotating body of air. The ideal case would be a rotating body in a vacuum chamber. Since the change of mass at a given point in space causes a change of density *ρ _{0}*, i.e. a change of charge, different potentials will be generated at different ends of the conductor.

**DEFLECTION OF LIGHT BY CHANGE OF MAGNETIC FIELD **

**Background**.Since magnetic field changes (as well as the gravity changes) are due to changes in the density of n=0-objects(I) *ρ _{0}*, light should deviate from a straight-line movement not only in strong gravitational fields but also as a result of changes in strong magnetic fields.

**Scheme of experiment**.The deflection of a beam of light is measured near a pulsed electric current that creates strong magnetic pulses. A similar experiment was carried out by Eugene Podkletnov and gave results consistent with the proposed theory (*Study of Light Interaction with Gravity Impulses and Measurements of the Speed of Gravity Impulses – Pp. 169-182 (14) Evgeny Podkletnov and Giovanni Modanese. Gravity-Superconductors Interactions: Theory and Experiment by Giovanni Modanese, Glen A. Robertson DOI: 10.2174/97816080539951120101; eISBN: 978-1-60805-399-5; 2012; ISBN: 978-1-60805-400-8*)

**CHANGE IN THE WEIGHT OF A BODY NEAR THE CHANGE OF MAGNETIC FIELD**

**Background**. According to the proposed theory, the density of n=0‑objects(I), *ρ _{0}*, is changed by moving electrons and positrons. As a result, a magnetic field is generated. Accordingly, a change in magnetic field strength leads to a change in the density of n=0‑objects(I),

*ρ*. The gravitational interaction is due to changes in density

_{0}*ρ*. For this reason, the local change of magnetic field will temporarily affect the gravitational attraction.

_{0}**Scheme of experiment**. It is proposed to produce unidirectional, pulsed, electric discharges. As protection against any electromagnetic radiation, a grounded screen should be installed. Behind the screen, the gravitational attraction is measured during the discharge. A similar experiment was carried out by Eugene Podkletnov and gave results consistent with the proposed theory (*Evgeny Podkletnov, Giovanni Modanese. Impulse Gravity Generator Based on Charged YBa2Cu3O7-x Superconductor with Composite Crystal Structure, arXiv physics/0108005, 30.08.2001*).

**CHANGES IN THE WEIGHT OF A BODY NEAR OTHER MOVING BODIES**

**Background**. According to the proposed theory, the density of n=0‑objects(I), *ρ _{0}*, determines the gravitational attraction. This means that a change in density

*ρ*, resulting from the motion of electrons and positrons (as well as ionized and unionized atoms), will cause a change in gravitational attraction. The motion of electrically neutral bodies will also change the density

_{0}*ρ*.

_{0}**Scheme of experiment**. A dense body is accelerated to maximum speed and allowed to collide with the massive screen. Behind the screen the gravitational attraction is measured at the moment of the collision.

### APPENDIX 1. CONSEQUENCES OF *h*‑SPACE THEORY BEYOND MODERN PHYSICS

**TETRANEUTRON, DIPROTON, DINEUTRON, MULTI-MUONS**

In the suggested theory, protons and neutrons are seen to be complexes of electrons and positrons. Unstable complexes having even more electrons and positrons are also possible, such as the tetraneutron (*Sherrill, B.M. and Bertulani, C.A. 2004 Proton-tetraneutron elastic scattering Phys. Rev. C 69, 027601*), the diproton (*Raciti, G. et al., 2008 Experimental Evidence of 2He Decay from 18Ne Excited States Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 195203–06*) and the dineutron (*Spyrou, A. et al., 2012 First Observation of Ground State Dineutron Decay: 16Be Phys. Rev. Lett. 108: 102501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.102501*) (see Fig. 14a). According to modern theoretical concepts, these complexes do not exist. Muons, in the suggested theory, have the same composition as protons, but in contrast to the proton, an unstable spatial configuration. Because of this, we can also consider as real the multi-muons, as unstable complexes, clusters of electrons and positrons. Multi-muons have been detected in collisions of protons and antiprotons (*CDF Collaboration 2008 Study of multi-muon events produced in p-pbar collisions at sqrt(s)=1.96 TeV arXiv:0810.5357*). Another unstable cluster can be a complex of three protons shown in figure 13a.

**VARIABILITY OF CONSTANTS**

In the proposed theory, the speed of light and the “Planck constant” are both constants. The charge of the electron corresponds to the density of n=0-objects(I) *ρ _{0}*and, accordingly, decreases with time. This reduction in charge can explain the results obtained by astronomer John K. Webb, who in 1999, discovered that light from a distant quasar 12billion light years, is absorbed by metal ions in interstellar clouds, but the absorbed photons do not correspond to the spectra of the metals. Since the interaction of light with matter is determined by the fine-structure constant,

*α*, then it has been suggested that

*α*had a different value. This assumption is not consistent with modern physical concepts. All three constants, which determine the alpha (

*α*=

*e*/

^{2}*hc*) – the electron charge (

*e*), the speed of light (

*c*) and the Planck constant (

*h*), cannot be changed. In the proposed theory, however, the electron charge is not constant. Accordingly, the alpha should decrease with time, offering an explanation for the observed change in the absorption/emission spectrum of metals.

**BOUNDARY OF GRAVITY AND KUIPER BELT**

In the proposed theory, the effect of gravity has a boundary that is determined by the density and size of a body. In the suggested theory, it is assumed that the Sun has a maximum density *ρ _{M}* , similar to the density of atomic nuclei. Under these conditions, the density of n=0‑objects(I)

*ρ*is maximal and equal to

_{M }*ρ*,

_{0}*ρ*=

_{M}*ρ*= 10

_{0}^{10}. The boundary of the Sun’s gravity can be calculated, taking into account the linear dimension of the Sun, and is ≈ 10

^{13}m (see “Gravitational attraction”). This is comparable to the distance from the Sun to the Kuiper Belt, ≈ 10

^{13}m.

To assess the limits of gravity of the planets (see “Gravitational attraction”), their density *ρ _{M}* is assumed to be less than that of the Sun. Then, the density of n=0-objects(I)

*ρ*is ≈ 10

_{M }^{6}–10

^{7}. The calculation for the Earth shows that the boundary of its gravitational action is around 10million kilometers.

**ANTI-GRAVITY**

The cause of gravity in the proposed theory is due to the reduction in density of n=0-objects(I) *ρ _{0}*, or, more precisely, the change in the density of the vacuum

*ρ*, around the body, as a result of the displacement of n=0‑objects(I) by the body. In addition to gravity, a change in the density of n=0-objects(I)

_{M}*ρ*takes place during the generation of magnetic field. It is characterized by the density

_{0}**appearing as the result of electrons/positrons motion. Changes in the magnetic field, i.e. the changes in the density of n=0-objects(I)**

*ρ*_{Δ }**, is associated with changes in the density of n=0‑objects(I)**

*ρ*_{Δ}*ρ*, and therefore should lead to a change in the gravitational attraction, which is associated with the decrease in the density

_{0}*ρ*.

_{0}**COLD FUSION – LOW ENERGY NUCLEAR REACTION (LENR)**

After the report in 1989 by Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons, the majority of cold fusion (LENR) experiments were performed by electrolysis of heavy water with a palladium cathode. The results (excess heat, helium generation,nuclear transmutations, neutron and tritium radiation) were inconsistent and contrary to the official current view on the synthesis of helium nuclei from deuteron. In another type of LENR experiment, nickel rods saturated with hydrogen were heated, and an excess heat was reported (*Anomalous Heat Production in Ni-H Systems. 1994 S. Focardi, R. Habel and F. Piantelli, IL NUOVOCIMENTO VOL. 107A, N. 1; Large excess heat production in Ni-H systems. 1998 S. Focardi, V. Gabbani, V. Montalbano, F. Piantelli and S. Veronesi, IL NUOVO CIMENTO VOL. 111A, N. 11*). In 2011, interest in LENR research was bolstered by the public demonstration of the E-cat device, performed by Andrea Rossi. In the E-cat, nickel powder is saturated with hydrogen and heated under high pressure, resulting in a significant excess of heat. The fuel in the E-cat contained additional elements besides the nickel, and according to the patent application, analysis of the fuel after its use in the E-cat showed that it contained a number of different elements, indicating that both nuclear fusion and fission had occurred during operation of the device (*http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/files/Patent_WO-2009-125444.pdf*). In 2013, a test of an improved design (E-cat HT) confirmed the previously observed thermal effects (*Levi, G., et al., 2013 Indication of anomalous heat energy production in a reactor device arXiv:1305.3913*), and in 2014 another independent test of Rossi’s device was performed (http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/LuganoReportSubmit.pdf). The investigators detected lithium, aluminum and iron in the initial fuel. The heat excess was again confirmed and it was found out that nickel and lithium in the ash had different isotopic ratios in comparison with the initial fuel. Of particular significance was a decrease in the amount of ^{7}Li, indicating the possibility of its fission.

In the proposed theory, LENR can be explained by the positron-electron composition of nuclei and the Coulomb law at atomic scales. According to the proposed theory:

- in atom, at distances between 10
^{−}^{15}to 10^{−}^{10 }meters, there is no attraction/repulsion of electrons and positrons; - in atom, attraction/repulsion increases from zero at 10
^{−}^{10 }meters to a maximum at 10^{−}^{5 }meters from the nucleus; - in the nucleus there is no strong interaction. Electrons and positrons are held by their attraction and repulsion to each other with a velocity of 10
^{−}^{2 }meters per second.

Thus, in the proposed theory the problem of overcoming the Coulomb repulsion between the nuclei and protons is not relevant for a range of distances from 10^{−}^{15 }to 10^{−}^{10}meters. In the range of distances 10^{−}^{5}–10^{−}^{10 }meters the repulsion exists and decreases from 10^{−}^{5 }meters to 10^{−}^{10 }meters. The same decrease is true for the distance bigger than 10^{−}^{5}meters. In condense matter, in the range of 10^{−}^{5}–10^{−}^{10 }meters, the repulsion between the nuclei and protons can be compensated by an attraction to the electrons placed at the same distance from the nucleus.

The heating of a proton-saturated nickel powder would increase the mobility of electrons and protons. Additionally, the pulsed magnetic field can also accelerate protons and electrons. The protons released from nickel powder can collide with themselves and lithium nuclei (as well as with nickel, aluminum and other elements nuclei). The protons in nickel lattice can collide with themselves, electrons and nickel nuclei. All these can lead to:

- the fission of proton and lithium nuclei (as well as nickel, aluminum and other elements nuclei);
- the fusion reactions generating neutrons and the nuclei not present initially, as the complexes of positrons and electrons.
- fission of nickel nuclei and nuclei of other elements.

The LEN fission reactions should be more effective at the distance range of micrometers since at the distances from 10^{−}^{5}to 10^{−}^{10 }meters the Coulomb repulsion between the nuclei and protons decreases. This implies that nickel powder in size of microns can be favorable for effective LEN reactions. For this distance in space between the nickel particles, the colliding protons and lithium nuclei will have the decreasing Coulomb repulsion from maximum to zero. If the distance between the protons and lithium nuclei is bigger than 10^{−}^{5 }meters, their collisions will face the opposite effect, the increase of the Coulomb repulsion having maximum at 10^{−}^{5 }meters. This makes less probable the collision of the protons and lithium nuclei, followed by their fission, from the distance bigger than 10^{−}^{5 }meters.

All fission reactions will generate heat and nuclear transmutations. The high level of heat production seen in the E-cat is due to the fission of lithium due to the interaction of lithium nuclei with protons, resulting in synthesis of beryllium, ^{8}_{4}Be, followed by the ^{8}_{4}Be fission to two alpha particles. The energy of generated alpha particles can be consumed further by protons, and this will keep the LEN reactions in self sustain mode, without external heating. The low efficiency of the earlier experiments with nickel rods can be explained by a lower rate of protons and nickel nuclei fission in comparison with E-cat having lithium as fuel.

In the proposed theory, nuclear fusion is possible as secondary reactions, but they will not produce the heat excess in LENR devices. The claimed thermonuclear effect of deuterium fusion in the thermonuclear explosion can be interpreted as the lithium fission since lithium (6Li) deuteride fuel was used in this process.

**FORMATION OF FOUR-DIMENSIONAL SPACE**

In the proposed theory, after a while three-dimensional space is predicted to be replaced by four-dimensional space. The important question then is when this can happen. To answer this it is necessary to compare the length of objects of four-dimensional space with the current linear dimension of the universe. Today, the linear size of the universe is estimated at ≈ 10^{26} m. With the creation of four-dimensional space, the length of objects of four-dimensional space, and the total length of the universe in absolute length units is 10^{30}. Since the absolute unit of length is equal to ≈ 10^{−}^{5} m, it follows that the current size of the universe is close to the total length of the beginning of four-dimensional space. Thus, the change from three-dimensional space to four-dimensional space could be very soon. Another estimate of the time of transition can be obtained by assuming the identity of the constant *c *= 1/√*ε _{0}μ_{0 }*and the velocity

*v*. The transition to four-dimensional space, as has been stated above, can happen at a linear size of the universe equal to the length of n=4-object. In this case, the velocity

_{0}ρ_{0}*v*will be reduced to the value equal to the velocity of one-dimensional objects, i.e. to the speed of light. A comparison of the values of the constant

_{0}ρ_{0 }*c*(velocity

*v*) and the speed of light can provide a rough estimation of the transition time. The constant

_{0}ρ_{0}*c*is the inverse square root of the product of the vacuum permeability,

*μ*, and the vacuum permittivity,

_{0}*ε*. In this product, the value of

_{0}*μ*is accurate and does not require the definition from the experiment. On the contrary

_{0 }*ε*is determined from experiment.

_{0 }Changes that will accompany the emergence of four-dimensional space, as noted in the section “Electrostatics”, are the change of electrostatic interaction from an inverse dependence on the square of the distance to the third degree of distance. This will lead to the destruction of atoms, which can be later regenerated. Electrons will be located at closer positions in the new atoms. Accordingly, the gravitational attraction will also change its dependence on distance, from the inverse square of distance to the inverse third degree of distance.

**CHARGE CLUSTERS**

The phenomenon of charge clusters was studied by Ken Shoulders (*http://www.rexresearch.com/ev/ev.htm**;**http://www.svn.net/krscfs/Charge%20Clusters%20In%20Action.pdf*). These clusters have sizes in the micrometer range, and have an excess of electrons in the ratio of the order of one positive ion for 100,000 electrons. The number of electrons in the cluster is 10^{8}–10^{11}. Stability of the clusters, and the absence of repulsion between the electrons in them, has no explanation in modern physics. In the proposed theory, the size and stability of the clusters can be explained by electrostatic interaction at a distance of less than 10^{−}^{5} m (see “Electrostatics” and “Atoms and Spectra”). The number of electrons also fits with the size of clusters. The linear arrangement of electrons (having a linear size 10^{−}^{15} m), when numbering 10^{8}–10^{11}, correlates with the cluster size, of around 10^{−}^{6} m. If the cluster size becomes larger, i.e. the distance between the electrons increases, this will change the nature of the electrostatic interaction between electrons, and the cluster will not be sustainable.

### THE PHYSICAL CONTENT OF h‑SPACE THEORY

**COSMOLOGY**

**EVOLUTION OF THE UNIVERSE**

In the proposed theory, the development of the universe is represented as follows. Objects constituting the universe are moving relative to each other, resulting in a periodically contracted and extended universe. This cyclical expansion has two phases, the α-phase and the β-phase, that oscillate between each other (see “Definition of a cyclic motion of n=0-objects of n=0-space”). In the initial state, the universe is zero-dimensional space, i.e. consists of objects of zero-dimensional space – n=0-objects(I). The universe has a minimal linear size at the beginning of the β-phase, when its size is equal to the size of objects of zero-dimensional space of the β-phase – L/q = h. Since the value of his equal to 10^{−}^{40}times of the absolute unit of length (which is ≈ 10^{−}^{5} m), the minimal linear size of the universe is 10^{−}^{45} m. As a result of the relative motion of objects of zero-dimensional space, n=0‑objects(I) of the β-phase, the universe will expand and at some moment reach a linear size equal to the length of objects of one-dimensional space of the β‑phase, (n=1-object), ≈ 10^{−}^{25} m (see “Definition of n≠0-objects and n≠0-spaces”). The equal amount of n=0‑objects(I) of the β-phase becomes n=1-objects and n=0‑objects(II)”−”,”+”, having a length ≈ 10^{−}^{35} m. Further expansion will lead to the emergence of two-dimensional space and n=2-objects having the length ≈ 10^{−}^{15} m. Finally, expansion of the β-phase will lead to the emergence of a three-dimensional space and n=3-objects with a characteristic length ≈ 10^{−}^{5} m. This length, ≈ 10^{−}^{5} m, corresponds to the absolute length unit, ≈ 10^{−}^{5} m. At this point, when three-dimensional space will appear, simultaneously, a transition from the β-phase to the α-phase will occur. Zero-dimensional space of the α-phase will arise and will be equal to the length of objects of one-dimensional space of the α-phase (≈ 10^{−}^{5} m), which will lead to the formation of one-dimensional space and its objects, n=1-objects (see “Definition of n≠0-objects and n≠0-spaces”). I.e. on the α-phase, in addition to zero-dimensional space one-dimensional space will appear, and n=1-objects of the α-phase will be generated from objects of the zero-dimensional space of the α‑phase. The equal amount of the n=0-objects(I) will become n=1-objects and n=0‑objects(II)”−”,”+”. At this time, objects of zero-dimensional space, n=0-objects(I) and n=0‑objects(II)”−”,”+”, will coexist with the objects of one-dimensional space, n=1-objects, as in the case of β-phase. Further, the one-dimensional universe will continue to expand until it reaches a size equal to the length of objects of two-dimensional space of the α-phase (n=2-objects), ≈ 10^{5} m. Accordingly, in addition to one-dimensional space, two-dimensional space will appear, in which there will be objects of zero-, one-, two-dimensional spaces. Similarly, when the linear size of the expanding universe reaches ≈ 10^{15} m, in the α-phase, three-dimensional space and its objects (n=3‑objects) will appear. Because the density of the n=0-objects(I) will decrease with time (with an increase in total length), then over time the speed of expansion of the universe for the same distance between two points will decrease.

According to the section “Electrostatics”, the density ρ_{0}to date is ≈ 10^{10}and, consequently, the velocity of the universe expansion is ≈ 10^{8} m/s, i.e. comparable to the speed of light. It should be noted that the above value of the density of n=0‑objects(I) corresponds to one, described in the second section, “head to tail” set of n=0-objects. The number of such sets is ≈ 10^{40}. They are located in parallel to each other. Since, in every set there are 10^{40}n=0-objects(I), the number of other n-objects of non-zero spaces (based on the proportional ratio) is also a number of the same order. Since the number of sets is ≈ 10^{40}, the total number of n-objects is equal to ≈ 10^{80}. This means that the number of electrons, positrons, protons and neutrons in our universe is about 10^{80},which is consistent with estimates in modern physics.

The n=0-objects(II)”−”,”+” of the α-phase in the one-, two- and three-dimensional spaces have the same linear size ≈ 10^{−}^{15} m, despite the fact that their volume is different. Based on the linear size of the universe, the linear size of the n=0‑objects(II)”−”,”+” and their number of 10^{80}, the relative distribution of the n=0‑objects(II)”−”,”+” in n-dimensional spaces can be determined. A simple calculation shows that in one-dimensional space, they should overlap, since their total volume is more than volume of one-dimensional space for its maximal linear size ≈ 10^{5} m, corresponding to the transition from one-dimensional to two-dimensional space – 10^{80} x 10^{−}^{15} > 10^{5} m. In the case of two-dimensional space, the situation is similar – 10^{80} x 10^{−}^{15×2} > 10^{15×2} m^{2}. It varies with the formation of three-dimensional space, since its volume at the time of formation, i.e. with linear dimensions of ≈ 10^{15} m, will be greater than the total volume of n=0‑objects(II)”−”,”+” – 10^{80} x 10^{−}^{15×3} < 10^{15×3} m^{3}. Thus, if before the formation of three-dimensional space, all the electrons and positrons overlap, from the moment of formation of three-dimensional space they can be distributed without overlapping each other. In addition, since there are n=1-objects in three-dimensional space, i.e. quanta of the electromagnetic field with a wavelength of ≈10^{−}^{5} m, as well as, n=2-objects and n=3‑objects, then electrons can absorb them and so increase their speed. This means that at the moment of formation of three‑dimensional space, electrons and positrons will go from a dense overlapping state to a state of scattering relative to each other. In other words, formation of the three-dimensional universe will cause an explosion, the dispersion of matter consisting of overlapping electrons and positrons. A similar state of the overlap of electrons and positrons takes place in the nuclei of atoms. I.e. we can say that in the proposed theory proto-matter has a nuclear structure.

At the beginning of the three-dimensional space, the density ρ_{0}was greater than today. The initial density can be calculated as the ratio of the maximum density ρ_{0} ≈ 10^{40}to the linear size of the universe, expressed in absolute units of length. For the transition from two- to three-dimensional space, characterized by length ≈ 10^{20}, such calculation gives a value for the density ρ_{0} ≈ 10^{20}, that is 10^{10}times more than the present value of the density ρ_{0} ≈ 10^{10}. The density ρ_{0}determines the wavelength of electromagnetic radiation in inverse proportion (see “Atoms and spectra”). An increase in the density ρ_{0}causes a decrease in the length of generated electromagnetic quanta. This means that today it is possible to detect the gamma rays of cosmic origin of the early universe with the minimal length ≈ 10^{−}^{26} m. Because these gamma rays are formed in the early development of three-dimensional space, their source today should be seen as coming towards us from a maximum distance. The existence of such phenomena, as gamma ray bursts and the detection of cosmic gamma rays of ultrahigh-energy, fit into the proposed idea.

The age of the universe is estimated to be about 10^{10}years. In the proposed theory, the age of universe is the same. It corresponds to the period from the beginning of the expansion of the total length of n=0‑objects(I) to the value of the present size of the universe, about 10^{26} m. Today, the velocity of expansion of the total length of n=0‑objects(I) is v_{0}ρ_{0}, which is roughly equal to the speed of light. Previously, the velocity of the expansion of the universe was greater and the distance less, and consequently the time of expansion was much smaller and can be ignored. To determine the age of the universe i.e., the time of expansion of the total length of n=0‑objects(I), the known size of the universe is divided by the speed of light. The result is 10^{18}seconds, or about 10^{10}years. Similarly, we can calculate the time from the beginning of the universe before the generation of the three-dimensional universe. As mentioned above, three-dimensional space is formed when the linear size of the universe reaches ≈ 10^{15} m which, in absolute length units (length of n=0-objects(I), ≈ 10^{−}^{5} m), is equal to a length of ≈ 10^{20}. Accordingly, the density of the n=0‑objects(I) is equal to ≈ 10^{20}, and the velocity of the expansion, in absolute units of velocity, is ≈ 10^{20}. Upon transfer of absolute units of velocity, 10^{−}^{2} m/s, to meters per second, this velocity is ≈ 10^{18} m/s. By dividing the length of ≈ 10^{15} m by the speed ≈ 10^{18} m/s, we get the time from the beginning of the universe to the appearance of the three-dimensional universe, ≈ 10^{−}^{3} s.

According to modern astrophysics, the universe is expanding with acceleration. Experimental evidence of this is a distance difference determined from the brightness of supernovae and their redshift according to Hubble’s law. The distance determined from the red shift is smaller than it should be from the brightness of supernovae. These observations have been interpreted as evidence that the acceleration is being driven by the action of dark energy. In the proposed theory, this discrepancy has another explanation due to the incorrect determination of distance from redshift. Nowadays, the redshift of Hubble’s law has theoretical explanation not by the Doppler effect (as it was at the time of discovery of Hubble’s law), but according to a cosmological model relating recessional velocity to the expansion of the universe. The Doppler redshift is limited to one unit, otherwise the objects will move at a speed greater than the speed of light. Besides the Doppler redshift there is redshift caused by gravitation, and the gravitational redshift can be greater than one unit. The observed redshifts are greater than one unit and so can be considered as gravitational in origin. The gravitational redshift in the proposed theory is due to a decrease in density ρ_{0}(see “Gravitational attraction”). The less distance to a massive body, the lower the density ρ_{0}and, accordingly, the greater wavelength and larger the redshift. In the early universe, the density ρ_{0}was greater than today. Accordingly, the gravitational redshift from distant cosmic objects of the early universe will be less than redshift from closer objects. This explains the less than expected redshift for distance determined from brightness of supernovae. Thus, the universe is not expanding with acceleration and there is no need for the concept of dark energy.

The proposed theory has a simple explanation for the existence of relic radiation. The formation of one-dimensional space means the generation of n=1-objects (electromagnetic quanta), whose length is equal to the absolute unit of length ≈10^{−}^{5} m. This length corresponds to the wavelength of relic radiation. Thus, the relic radiation represents n=1‑objects of one-dimensional space that have remained after their absorption by electrons. Obviously, n=2- and n=3-objects generated in result of the formation of n=2 -, n=3-dimensional spaces of the universe, should also exist in the three-dimensional space. They are predicted to have tremendous speed, ≈ 10^{18} m/s and 10^{28} m/s respectively, as well as considerable lengths, ≈ 10^{5} m and 10^{15} m, respectively. Similar to the objects of one-dimensional space, they are absorbed/emitted by electrons and reflected from positrons without changing their velocity. At the beginning of the formation of the universe, electrons and positrons are not moving relative to each other. Absorption of the n=1-, n=2-, n=3-objects will increase velocity of the electrons and this will lead to the spatial separation of the moving electrons from the resting positrons. Such separation will create electrostatic attractions resulting ultimately in the formation of atomic nuclei having more positrons than electrons. This will then allow the formation of atoms and, accordingly, the generation of gravitational attraction. Gravitational attraction and collisions of atoms will generate, in turn, n=1-, n=2-, n=3-objects. Thus, the formation of atomic matter in the universe, is possible due to the energy (velocity) of electrons after absorption of n=1-, n=2-, n=3-objects, generated with the formation of the n=1-, n=2-, n=3-dimensional spaces of our universe.

According to the section “Metaphysical principia of h-spacetheory”, for our universe, the “Planck constant” is equal to a certain value. Other constant values, as well as other absolute units of length and velocity, define the variants of universe. Moreover, all the variants of universe, as Multiverse, have the same laws as, for example, the Coulomb law or law of gravitation attraction.

**FORMATION OF STARS AND PLANETS**

The proposed formation of the three-dimensional universe, as an explosion of the densely packed electron-positron protosubstance, suggests that the stars can be remnants of this protosubstance. This differs from the modern cosmological models where the raw material of stars is atomic hydrogen, and the stars are formed due to gravitational compression of the hydrogen mass. The formation of stars from protosubstance at the early stages of the universe would explain the structure of the universe that we see in forms of galaxies with their characteristic dimensions.As noted above, at the beginning of the three-dimensional universe, the density ρ_{0}was equal to ≈ 10^{20}, a value greater than the density today,ρ_{0} ≈ 10^{10}, by 10^{10}times. In the early universe electron-positron protosubstance had the same dense packing of electrons and positrons that is found in the nuclei of atoms today. According to the description of gravitational attraction (see “Gravitational attraction”), this means that the electron-positron protosubstance of stars displaced all n=0‑objects(I), in an amount of ≈ 10^{20}.I.e., the decrease in the density of n=0‑objects(I) ρ_{M}reached value ≈ 10^{20}. In turn, this means that in the early three-dimensional universe the maximum limit of gravitational attraction of stars was more than today.If we consider a star having the size of the sun, then for the density ρ_{M} ≈ 10^{20}and from the following equation – 1 = ρ_{M}/4πR^{2}, the maximal distance of the gravitational attraction of such a star is equal to ≈ 10^{10}of diameters of the Sun (10^{9} m), i.e. ≈ 10^{19} m.The size of our galaxy is about 10^{21} m.For giant stars, whose size is 10 – 100 times more then the size of Sun, the boundary of the gravitational attraction is comparable to the size of the galaxy.This means that at the beginning of our three-dimensional universe, stars attracted each other by gravitation up to distances comparable with the dimensions of galaxies.Accordingly, we can consider the dimensions of galaxies to be determined by the maximum gravitational attraction of stars at the early stages of three-dimensional universe. In the later stages of the universe, this maximal limit of a star’s gravity decreased, as the density of n=0‑objects(I) ρ_{0}decreased. Further expansion of the universe would lead to increasing distances between stars, at which gravity between them could no longer act. For example, the star nearest to us from the constellation Centaurus is comparable in size to the Sun but is placed at a distance that is approximately three orders of magnitude greater than the maximal distance of the gravitational attraction by these stars (according to the proposed theory). As a result, we can observe the galaxies in which the outer stars are not held by gravity. According to modern concepts, such galaxies cannot exist, because the stars are formed by the gravitational attraction of the mass of hydrogen, and then gravity gathers stars in the galaxy. All the stars must be held together by gravity. The concept of dark matter was introduced in order to account for the supposed gravitational attraction necessary to hold the outer stars in spiral galaxies, since it was found that the stars velocities are not decreasing, as it is expected to be if gravity force has no a distance limit, but they are becoming constant for the distances greater than a certain distance. The mechanism of galaxy formation in the proposed theory explains the fact that many peripheral stars in galaxies have high velocities and cannot be held by gravity. The reason of this is the existence of maximum distance of the gravitational attraction. Accordingly, there is no need for the concept of dark matter to retain the peripheral stars in the galaxies. Some observations confirm the formation of stars in the early stages of the universe (*Caffau, E. et al., 2011 An extremely primitive star in the Galactic halo Nature 477, 67–69 doi:10.1038/nature10377*). From these publications it follows that all galaxies are at the same age, and the stars in galaxies should be formed in the early universe.

The number of positrons in the stars must be greater than that of electrons. This follows from the fact that the electrons absorb n=1-, n=2‑and n=3-objects and thereby acquire a certain velocity, unlike positrons which reflect these objects without changing their velocity. Since n=1‑, n=2-, n=3-objects are produced during the evolution of the universe, they will knock out electrons from the electron-positron protosubstance. Then, due to gravity, the remnants of the electron-positron protosubstance, dominated by positrons, will gather in stars. Accordingly, electrons compensating the positive charge of the star will be located at some distance, probably in the corona of the Sun. In this case, the energy radiation of the stars is not generated in thermonuclear fusion reactions of protons, but by the radioactive decay energy of the positive electron-positron protosubstance, similar to the radioactive decay energy of the positive nuclei of atoms. I.e. the electrons of the protosubstance in stars can absorb n=1-, n=2- and n=3-objects remaining from the beginning of the three-dimensional universe, and this causes radioactive decay of the protosubstance to electron-positron complexes (elementary particles). Thus, n=1-objects and especially n=2- objects and n=3-objects that are fast moving throughout whole universe, play a key role in the generation of radiation from stars.

Dense packing of electrons and positrons in the stars suggests that they, as well as Sun, represent black holes. In the section “Gravitational attraction”, it was mentioned that due to the minimum density of n=0‑objects(I) inside of stars there is minimal radiation, i.e. the inside of the Sun is not hot, but cold. With increasing distance from the center of Sun, the density of n=0‑objects(I) increases. Accordingly, the energy of the emitted photons increases, producing an increase in temperature with distance from the surface of the Sun (as for all other stars). This gradient of n=0‑objects(I) density also implies that electrostatic interactions are weaker near the surface of Sun and became stronger away from it. Solar activity in this case can be explained by changes in electron-positron composition of the stellar surface. Since in the proposed theory, only electrons can absorb and emit electromagnetic rays, the sunspots are predicted to be areas in which there are changes in the content of electrons that are absorbing and emitting electromagnetic quanta (n=1-objects), as well as n=2-objects and n=3-objects. Accordingly, in the brighter areas there is a process of decay of positively charged electron-positron complexes accompanied by the emission of electromagnetic quanta by electrons, while in the black spots the reverse process occurs, the absorption of electromagnetic quanta by electrons. This represents an increase of the electron velocity in sunspots compared to the light areas. As a consequence, there is a directional movement of electrons between sunspots and the external light areas, which means the formation of strong magnetic fields. In this mechanism, the magnetic fields are consequences and not the causes of sunspots as in modern physics. Based on the periodicity of solar activity it can be assumed that the sunspots can appear as a result of gravitational effects from the large planets – Jupiter and Saturn.

Unlike stars, planets can be seen as complexes of atoms, and not dense nuclear packing of electrons and positrons typical for stars. Nevertheless, the hot cores of planets like Earth are likely to have a nuclear packing of electrons and positrons that is similar to that found in stars. Like stars, this core should produce energy as a result of radioactive decay. In this case we can assume that planets represent the died stars.

**COMMENTS**

The proposed theory is consistent with existing theories regarding the expansion of the universe after the Big Bang. However, in detail, it significantly differs from modern cosmological ideas. The energy of the stars is not the energy of thermonuclear reactions, and the insides of stars are not extremely hot, they are relatively cold. The chemical elements of the higher atomic numbers are created inside of planets or on the surface of stars, but not as a result of the fusion of hydrogen inside stars. The relic radiation is not cooled down radiation from the Big Bang, but represents objects of one-dimensional space formed at the initial stage of universe evolution.

**THE SECOND UNIVERSE**

As mentioned in the section “Magnetic field of electric current”, the directed n=0-objects(I) form magnetic field lines as enclosed space structures. In these structures, the n=0‑objects(I) move relative to each other regardless of the movement of undirected n=0‑objects(I) of the cycle. This means that when a magnetic field is generated by a current, i.e. by movement of n=0-objects(II)”−”,”+”, then vacuum particles, n=0‑objects(I), transit from the cycle motion to the directed movement in enclosed space structures of the magnetic field. These structures correspond to the contours introduced in the second chapter in the section “Definition of second type of Space/Universe”. They represent a new Universe – the space of contours having various geometrical forms. These contours are connected to each other or existing separately. The second Universe is separated from the first Universe of the cycling Space/Matter and is indefinitely growing.

The richest geometrical forms of second Universe are created by the living organisms since they have a variety of the spatial configurations of ions motions in complex electro-chemical processes. It is true for all forms of life, from a single cell to the complex organisms. The prominent examples of such processes are those in the humane brain.

The essence of Life can be formulated as a continuous creation of second Universe of the most complex geometrical forms.